Each one of us, I
do believe, are a small part of God that makes up the whole God ultimately. Let
me explain what I mean. We as conscious beings are each cellular part that
makes up the full living God, God is not a being outside of us in any way, but
we are all cellular parts of what God is. When we look in the mirror, we are
looking at a small part of God. When we look at full existence, we are looking
at God. The full God concept is the whole of existence, and God started out as
an objective concept before starting out as anything else before the medium of
creation. Some may argue that point with me, but from my point of view there is
not much to argue, because that is a pretty accurate description in brief. But
as you can tell this will be a pretty long and interesting article about this
point, because this topic deserves that treatment.
So, to refute
certain things outside of my point first of all: If God was dead, existence
would not exist if my concept of God is accurate. Here, I am oversimplifying to
get a point across, an honest point. There is something to everything, even the
foolish, or it would not at least exist as a concept. Sure, I can say many
things here, but I will make as broad "brush strokes" as possible to
get my point across simply, yet accurately and logically. This will surprise
you: But this article is not an attack on world religions or even an attempt at
"cracker barrel" philosophy. This article is actually validating the
genuine and real point of religion by logically and methodically exposing its
logical philosophical core realities.
So, we have
established two concepts, God is alive as every living being is a part of God
and existence and has existed as a conceptual structure before it existed as
existence proper. So, think of a giant oak tree laying inside an acorn. That
acorn has the concept of an oak tree within it, but it has to evolve over years
into that mighty oak tree. That is part of my point. The essential concept is
to show the thread of concept that links it all, a God concept if you will.
Now, sure, I can
use fancy language to describe the obvious, but honestly, making things too
complex has no point. The best thing to do is bring it down to the lowest
common denominator, which I am doing. The highest common denominator is not to
question anything and accept things on "pure" irrational faith
without going deeply into the questions and answers and realities and making
assumptions without going deeper. Yes, the lowest and highest common
denominator meanings are learned in math class in school or any basic math
book. But I will still explain what I mean by those terms anyway. The lowest
common denominator is the simplest solution. The highest common denominator is
complex, "Rube Goldberg" cartoon style silliness that is not
workable. That is what I mean by highest common denominator, not so much the
math term where one million is the highest common denominator for so many
numbers. Sure, I can be less balanced and reasoned about religion and
philosophy and more emotional, but what good would it do? Nothing, which is why
I am going to continue taking the road I am taking on this without "let
up" of any sort. "You can put the boy in the jungle and the man is
still in the jungle even when he has mastered and outgrown the jungle" so
to speak. We all live in existence, no matter what, even when we have mastered
it seemingly. God is a master, but God was like us once if I am right. Even the
Christian holy book says that we were made in his image, and every holy book
essentially echoes this reality right down to the Upanishads a few thousand
years before the Christian holy book. My point is not debate, argument or
polemic. Reality to be mastered needs to be fully understood and understood
deeply. I could go on at least two hundred or three hundred more words, but I
want you to think, and think deeply, especially about existence, reality and
all related subjects for yourself as I do for myself.
No comments:
Post a Comment